For the first time
since high school I’ve tried to start regularly handwriting again. I like the
way it feels more pure and direct, with no chance to backspace and rewrite. The action of handwriting is smoother and less mechanical
than typing. I like the way that it’s an uninterrupted conduit between my
head, my arm and the page: the act of writing becomes a real, physical thing.
Feeding words into a computer can feel formless and inconsequential—a 2000 word
document takes up virtually the same amount of space as a 200 word one—whereas
the exercise book I’m writing in is slowly being filled by words, by ink. The
words I handwrite have weight and texture; I can run my hand over the page and
feel the indentations of the pen marks.
And the words are
unmistakeably mine—my handwriting may be messy but generally it’s legible (at
least to me). And the pen itself and the type of book aren’t important—there’s
actually something kind of satisfying about using inexpensive implements to create
something that has more worth (well, hopefully) than what was used to bring it
into existence.
I presume that I type
faster than I handwrite, but my thoughts don’t really lose pace with my hand as
I thought they might when handwriting. Rather the words seem to be stored in my
head and as I write they form on the page while my brain remains a couple of
words in front. A bit like breathing, it becomes difficult if you over
think this process; you sort of just have to let it happen. I learned yesterday
that the eye actually skims ahead while reading, so that if the light was
suddenly switched off the brain knows the next couple of words ahead of the one
that it is ostensibly ‘focused’ on. I presume something similar occurs when
writing.
The above is a pic of
the first draft of this post as it appears in my exercise book. It’s kind of
strange to stop and think about the huge difference between those words
appearing on a page in a notebook, which is personal and private, and then
seeing those words (or at least a version of those words) up on the most public
and pervasive sphere in existence—not that the fact it appears now online
necessarily means that it will be read by any greater number of people. But the
fact I post this means I am accepting of the possibility that someone may read
these words, whereas when I’m handwriting there is a fairly implicit knowledge
that nobody will see it (when I was writing initially I didn’t have the idea to
put the picture online, thus I was certain that the words on the page would
remain private). In some ways it’s a shame that novels etc. are not presented
as handwritten manuscripts, because while fonts can be wonderfully emotive they
are a barrier between the writer and reader—an extra layer that must be
navigated and interpreted.
This may be why I find
it so intriguing to see an author’s
handwritten notes on pages—it is as if I’ve been invited to a greater level
of intimacy with that writer. Indeed, handwritten notes are intimate even if
not from ‘famous’ people, e.g. birthday cards or postcards. Handwritten words
approximate something much closer to ‘thought’ rather than writing: most
people’s handwriting is scrawling and imperfect, arguably like the nature of
thought itself. It retains an ‘immediate’ or ‘fresh’ quality, direct from the
source. Furthermore, handwriting is always unique—typed letters rob individual
writers and their thoughts of their personal nature. Is this loss of personality
in handwriting something we don’t miss anymore simply because we’re so used to
typed characters? Style and voice still count for a lot, of course—good writers
have personality and presence even when working in Courier. But the barrier
remains, and perhaps deprives us of a deeper, more biological (even
biomechanical?) connection with the writer that only handwriting can
provide.